Course program
1) Introduction and Background (8 hours)
- Adult and embryonic stem cells; differentiation potential; stem cell niche; examples of adult stem cells; epigenetics.
- Molecular biology techniques for the study of stem cells.
2) Molecular basis of pluripotency (20 hours)
- Origin of embryonic stem cells; regulatory circuits in the formation of the mammalian blastocyst.
- Regulation of pluripotency: signaling, "naive" and "primed" states of pluripotency, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory networks, epigenetic control of pluripotency, regulation by microRNAs and lncRNAs.
- Molecular basis of pluripotent stem cell differentiation; examples of differentiation to generate cell types for therapy and research; strategies to improve the efficiency of differentiation.
- Pluripotent stem cells in basic research and regenerative medicine.
3) Cell reprogramming and transdifferentiation (20 hours)
- From nuclear transfer to iPS cells;
- Molecular mechanisms of reprogramming; deterministic and stochastic models; early, intermediate and late phases in reprogramming; epigenetic memory.
- Patient-specific iPS cells; applications of reprogramming in basic research and regenerative medicine; "genome editing" techniques to correct mutations; generation of organoids in vitro.
- Transdifferentiation: methods and applications; epigenetic basis of transdifferentiation; examples of transdifferentiation to obtain cells of therapeutic interest (muscle, neurons).
Prerequisites
Prerequisites (“propedeuticità”) are not required. However, the student must have basic notions of cellular and molecular biology.
Books
Reference scientific articles and other teaching material will be indicated during the lectures. The teacher will also make available the powerpoint presentations of the lessons on the Sapienza Elearning platform.
Teaching mode
The course takes place through a series of lectures and seminars.
Frequency
Attendance is optional but strongly recommended
Exam mode
Assessment method: only oral exam to be held after the end of the course. The objective of the test is to verify the knowledge acquired, in line with the training objectives. The questions will be open and with an open answer. The duration of the oral exam will be approximately 30 minutes. The following elements will be considered for evaluation: acquisition of knowledge and autonomous reasoning skills. These aspects contribute in equal measure to the formulation of the final score.
Bibliography
Ramalho-Santos, M. & Willenbring, H. (2007). On the origin of the term “stem cell.” Cell Stem Cell, 1, 35–38.
Dröscher, A. (2014). Images of cell trees, cell lines, and cell fates: the legacy of Ernst Haeckel and August Weismann in stem cell research. HPLS, 36, 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0028-8
Hsu, Y.-C. & Fuchs, E. (2012). A family business: stem cell progeny join the niche to regulate homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 13, 103–114.
Zernicka-Goetz, M., Morris, S. A. & Bruce, A. W. (2009). Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Genet, 10, 467–477.
Evans, M. (2011). Discovering pluripotency: 30 years of mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 12, 680–686.
Bermejo-Alvarez, P., Ramos-Ibeas, P. & Gutierrez-Adan, A. (2012). Solving the ‘x’ in embryos and stem cells. Stem Cells Dev, 21, 1215–1224.
Jaenisch, R. & Young, R. (2008). Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell, 132, 567–582.
Gonzales, K. A. U. & Ng, H.-H. (2011). Choreographing pluripotency and cell fate with transcription factors. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1809, 337–349.
Boyer, L. A. et al. (2005). Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell, 122, 947–956.
Cole, M. F., Johnstone, S. E., Newman, J. J., Kagey, M. H. & Young, R. A. (2008). Tcf3 is an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev, 22, 746–755.
Whyte, W. A., Orlando, D. A., Hnisz, D., Abraham, B. J., Lin, C. Y., Kagey, M. H., Rahl, P. B., Lee, T. I. & Young, R. A. (2013). Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell, 153, 307–319.
Spivakov, M. & Fisher, A. G. (2007). Epigenetic signatures of stem-cell identity. Nat Rev Genet, 8, 263–271.
Mattout, A. & Meshorer, E. (2010). Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 22, 334–341.
Jones, A. & Wang, H. (2010). Polycomb repressive complex 2 in embryonic stem cells: an overview. Protein Cell, 1, 1056–1062.
Gaspar-Maia, A., Alajem, A., Meshorer, E. & Ramalho-Santos, M. (2011). Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 12, 36–47.
Li, M., Liu, G.-H. & Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C. (2012). Navigating the epigenetic landscape of pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 13, 524–535.
Young, R. A. (2011). Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell, 144, 940–954.
Voigt, P. et al. (2013). A double take on bivalent promoters. Genes Dev, 27, 1318–1338.
White, J. & Dalton, S. (2005). Cell cycle control of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reviews, 1, 131–138.
Conklin, J. F. & Sage, J. (2009). Keeping an eye on retinoblastoma control of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem, 108, 1023–1030.
Rosa, A. & Brivanlou, A. H. (2009). microRNAs in early vertebrate development. Cell Cycle, 8.
Wang, Y. & Blelloch, R. (2009). Cell cycle regulation by microRNAs in embryonic stem cells. Cancer Res, 69, 4093–4096.
Rosa, A. & Brivanlou, A. H. (2013). Regulatory non-coding RNAs in pluripotent stem cells. Int J Mol Sci, 14, 14346–14373.
Rosa, A. & Ballarino, M. (2016). Long noncoding RNA regulation of pluripotency. Stem Cells Int, 2016:1797692.
Fatica, A. & Bozzoni, I. (2014). Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development. Nat Rev Genet, 15, 7–21.
Karus, M., Blaess, S. & Brüstle, O. (2014). Self-organization of neural tissue architectures from pluripotent stem cells. J Comp Neurol, 522, 2831–2844.
Gurdon, J. B. & Melton, D. A. (2008). Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science, 322, 1811–1815.
Gurdon, J. (2009). Nuclear reprogramming in eggs. Nature Medicine. doi:10.1038/nm1009-1141.
Gurdon, J. B. & Byrne, J. A. (2004). The first half-century of nuclear transplantation. Biosci Rep, 24, 545–557.
Yamanaka, S. (2008). Pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363, 2079–2087.
Graf, T. (2011). Historical origins of transdifferentiation and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell, 9, 504–516.
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126, 663–676.
Martello, G. & Smith, A. (2014). The nature of embryonic stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 30, 647–675.
Ohtsuka, S. & Dalton, S. (2008). Molecular and biological properties of pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Gene Ther, 15, 74–81.
Pera, M. F. & Tam, P. P. L. (2010). Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 465, 713–720.
Dreesen, O. & Brivanlou, A. H. (2007). Signaling pathways in cancer and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reviews, 3, 7–17.
Nichols, J. & Smith, A. (2009). Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell, 4, 487–492.
Yamanaka, S. (2007). Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 1, 39–49.
Zhao, R. & Daley, G. Q. (2008). From fibroblasts to iPS cells: induced pluripotency by defined factors. J Cell Biochem, 105, 949–956.
Wernig, M. et al. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent nES-cell-like state. Nature, 448, 318–324.
Vierbuchen, T. & Wernig, M. (2012). Molecular roadblocks for cellular reprogramming. Mol Cell, 47, 827–838.
Papp, B. & Plath, K. (2011). Reprogramming to pluripotency: stepwise resetting of the epigenetic landscape. Cell Res, 21, 486–501.
Stadtfeld, M. & Hochedlinger, K. (2010). Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. Genes Dev, 24, 2239–2263.
Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. A. & Jaenisch, R. (2013). Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming. Nat Rev Genet, 14, 427–439.
Sancho-Martinez, I. & Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C. (2013). Stem cells: Surf the waves of reprogramming. Nature, 493, 310–311.
Silva, J., Nichols, J., Theunissen, T. W., Guo, G., van Oosten, A. L., Barrandon, O., Wray, J., Yamanaka, S., Chambers, I. & Smith, A. (2009). Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell, 138, 722–737.
Kiskinis, E. & Eggan, K. (2010). Progress toward the clinical application of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest, 120, 51–59.
Pera, M. F. (2011). Stem cells: The dark side of induced pluripotency. Nature, 471, 46–47.
Drews, K., Jozefczuk, J., Prigione, A. & Adjaye, J. (2012). Human induced pluripotent stem cells—from mechanisms to clinical applications. J Mol Med, 90, 735–745.
Sandoe, J. & Eggan, K. (2013). Opportunities and challenges of pluripotent stem cell neurodegenerative disease models. Nat Neurosci, 16(7), 780–789.
Bilic, J. & Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C. (2012). Concise review: Induced pluripotent stem cells versus embryonic stem cells: close enough or yet too far apart? Stem Cells, 30, 33–41.
Rowe, R. G. & Daley, G. Q. (2019). Induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Genet, 20, 377–388.
Vierbuchen, T. & Wernig, M. (2011). Direct lineage conversions: unnatural but useful? Nat Biotechnol, 29, 892–907.
Lesson mode
The course takes place through a series of lectures and seminars.