Architectural Sciences

The course is articulated in a theoretical part followed by an applied experience. Lessons follow a systemic, multi-scalar and trans-disciplinary approach to territory that takes into account both the tangible and intangible features of the landscape. The theoretical part is articulated into the following lines of training contributions: • provide a theoretical framework on different methods of territorial reading (multi-disciplinary and multi-scalar) and on the main issues in landscape planning; • an interpretative and reading method of territorial issues, focused on bring out the landscape features, is widely explained and then applied on a case study area. This method, which organizes the knowledges in a two dimensions matrix, takes into account the“ reading of the physical and human environment” (tangible features) as well as the "perception of physical and human environment" (intangible features) particularly useful for the landscape actions; • explanation of the features of the main operational tools for urban regeneration programs; • provide basic knowledge elements for the use of GIS systems in the drawn up of thematic maps. The applied experience will deal with the theme of urban regeneration. The study case will be located in an urban area characterized by settlements with diversified features: from high density settlements to low density settlements in dispersion areas. In order to capture practical effects of the theoretical frameworks a seminarial work, carried out in the classroom, is organized. The aim is to acquire the capacity of a synthetic interpretation of the different topics discussed. The detailed program and the teaching support materials will be published, at the beginning of the lessons, in the Sapienza E-learning platform.

In order to fully understand the teaching contents and to achieve the learning objectives the student must have learned the following knowledge: • it is essential to have acquired the knowledge of fundamental urban planning issues • it is important to have acquired the geometric representation basics (projections and sections) • it is important to have acquired sufficient analytical skills and design techniques

Articles and pages chosen to take the exam: • CORBOZ A., (1995), "Il territorio come palinsesto" in "Casabella" n. 516. • LYNCH K., (1960), "L'immagine ambientale", pp. 23-35, in LYNCH K., (1960),"L'immagine della città", Marsilo, Venezia • MODIGLIANI D., (2017), L’area romana e le sue periferie. Un’analisi del contesto capitolino a partire dall’unificazione d’Italia, in “Periferia” AR n. 119 ottobre 2017 • NUNEZ J., (2010), "Paesaggi, passaggi" in "Lettera Internazionale" Numero 105 - III Trimestre. • TURRI E., (1995),"Il paesaggio oltre la geografia" in MUSCARÀ C. (a cura di) "Piani, parchi, paesaggi", Laterza, Bari. • SITTE C., L’arte di costruire le città. L’urbanistica secondo i suoi fondamenti artistici, Jaca book, Milano, 1984 • PRG ROMA (Vari articoli definiti nel corso delle lezioni) Planning instrument to examine: PTPR – Piano Territoriale Paesistico Regionale PTPG – Piano Territoriale Provinciale Generale (Provincia di Roma) PRG08 Roma

The lessons are structured in different ways : • focused on theoretical framework; • focused on guidelines for the applied activities • focused on discussion of the applied activities through a collective seminarial debate. The final evaluation will be given by a compensation of the results of the following criteria: • Completeness of knowledge of the theoretical topics: mastery of the themes / problems dealt with in the lessons and readings; appropriate use of the terminology of the discipline; outcomes of the attention and quality of the presentation tests. • Quality of the documents of the applied reading and design exercises: appropriate knowledge of the places, quality of the project proposal, consistency of method, correct use of terminology, consistency with the theoretical indications provided by the course, active and constant participation in the seminar. To take the exam, each student must: 1) Produce the calculations relating to the applied exercise, the minimum contents of which will be better specified in the seminar activities. In any case, at least the following documents are required: • a - Reading the rule of law - programmatic framework (various scales) • b - Reading of the state of affairs - morphological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • c - Reading of the state of affairs - ecological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • d - Reading of the state of affairs - functional characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • e - Reading of the state of affairs - diachronic formation of the state of fact (Scale 1: 10000) • f - Project proposal - volumetric plan (Scale 1: 2000) • g - Project proposal - morphological prescriptive (Scale 1: 2000) • h - Project proposal - zoning (Scale 1: 2000) The works a, b, c, d, e may be elaborated in a concerted way by informal groups of students even if the contents will remain the sole responsibility of the individual student. The works f, g, h are strictly personal. 2) During the examination, the documents referred to in point 1 will be presented in a strictly personal form in "pecha kucha" format (max 7 minutes - about 20 slides) with the help of a power point. During the presentation, the student must highlight the relationship between the choices made in the reading and project process and the topics covered in the communications with particular reference to the topics covered by the questions of the attention tests. References to themes and reflections taken from the literature reported must also be highlighted. 3) In principle no further direct questions will be asked. Nevertheless, during the interview in order to better ascertain the preparation, some questions may still be asked (also on the contents of the preparatory planning courses). During the examination it is necessary to submit all the documents in digital format (for example * .jpg - resolution for printing) including the presentation (* .ppt).

Attendance is not mandatory but strongly recommended. The lessons are structured in different ways : • focused on theoretical framework; • focused on guidelines for the applied activities • focused on discussion of the applied activities through a collective seminarial debate. The final evaluation will be given by a compensation of the results of the following criteria: • Completeness of knowledge of the theoretical topics: mastery of the themes / problems dealt with in the lessons and readings; appropriate use of the terminology of the discipline; outcomes of the attention and quality of the presentation tests. • Quality of the documents of the applied reading and design exercises: appropriate knowledge of the places, quality of the project proposal, consistency of method, correct use of terminology, consistency with the theoretical indications provided by the course, active and constant participation in the seminar. To take the exam, each student must: 1) Produce the calculations relating to the applied exercise, the minimum contents of which will be better specified in the seminar activities. In any case, at least the following documents are required: • a - Reading the rule of law - programmatic framework (various scales) • b - Reading of the state of affairs - morphological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • c - Reading of the state of affairs - ecological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • d - Reading of the state of affairs - functional characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • e - Reading of the state of affairs - diachronic formation of the state of fact (Scale 1: 10000) • f - Project proposal - volumetric plan (Scale 1: 2000) • g - Project proposal - morphological prescriptive (Scale 1: 2000) • h - Project proposal - zoning (Scale 1: 2000) The works a, b, c, d, e may be elaborated in a concerted way by informal groups of students even if the contents will remain the sole responsibility of the individual student. The works f, g, h are strictly personal. 2) During the examination, the documents referred to in point 1 will be presented in a strictly personal form in "pecha kucha" format (max 7 minutes - about 20 slides) with the help of a power point. During the presentation, the student must highlight the relationship between the choices made in the reading and project process and the topics covered in the communications with particular reference to the topics covered by the questions of the attention tests. References to themes and reflections taken from the literature reported must also be highlighted. 3) In principle no further direct questions will be asked. Nevertheless, during the interview in order to better ascertain the preparation, some questions may still be asked (also on the contents of the preparatory planning courses). During the examination it is necessary to submit all the documents in digital format (for example * .jpg - resolution for printing) including the presentation (* .ppt).

To take the exam, each student must: • produce graphic and textual elaborations (drawings, reports, survey, ecc.) on the applied exercise • to demonstrate, in an individual interview, to understand the theoretical topics covered. Each student, individually, must demonstrate that he has matured original reflections starting from the theoretical communications held during the course. The criteria by which the final evaluation will be determined are summarized: • Average of the results of the attention tests (or of the replacement papers); • Active and constant participation in the seminar; • Quality of presentation in pecha kuthca format; • Evaluation of the documents of the applied reading and design exercises: appropriate knowledge of the places, quality of the project proposal, consistency of method, correct use of terminology, consistency with the theoretical indications provided by the course; • Any questions on theoretical topics: mastery of the themes / problems dealt with in the lessons and readings and appropriate use of the terminology of the discipline.

Reference bibliography for the theoretical framework (optional) BERGHAUSER PONT M. - HAUPT P., Spacemate. The spatial logic of urban density, University Press, Delft, 2002 CALZOLARI V., (1999), "Storia e natura come sistema : un progetto per il territorio libero dell'area romana", Àrgos, Roma, CALZOLARI V., Paesistica = Paisaje, Istituto Universitario de Urbanismo, Valladolid, 2012 CANIGGIA G. - MAFFEI G. L., Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia. Lettura dell’edilizia di base, Marsilio, Venezia, 1979 CORBOZ A., Il territorio come palinsesto in VIGANÒ P. (a cura di), Ordine sparso. Saggi sull’arte, il metodo, la città e il territorio, Franco Angeli, Milano, 1998 DE PIERI F., (a cura di), "Gilles Clement, Manifesto del terzo paesaggio", Quodlibet, Macerata, 2005 GARANO S. (a cura di), Valle Giulia 1911-2011. La valle delle accademie tra storia e progetto, Palombi, Roma, 2006 INDOVINA F. - FREGOLENT L. - SAVINO M. (a cura di), L’esplosione della città, Compositori, Bologna, 2005 INSOLERA I., Roma moderna. Un secolo di storia urbanistica 1870-1970, Einaudi, Torino, 2001 JACOBS J., Vita e morte delle grandi città. Saggio sulle metropoli americane, Edizioni di Comunità, Torino, 2000 LYNCH K., L’immagine della città, Marsilio, Padova, 1969 RICCI L., Diffusione insediativa, territorio e paesaggio. Un progetto per il governo delle trasformazioni territoriali contemporanee, Carocci, Roma, 2005 TURRI E., "La conoscenza del territorio", Marsilio, Venezia, 2002 VALORANI C., (2010), …verso la trasformazione!!!, Aracne Editrice, Roma

The lessons are structured in different ways : • focused on theoretical framework; • focused on guidelines for the applied activities • focused on discussion of the applied activities through a collective seminarial debate. The final evaluation will be given by a compensation of the results of the following criteria: • Completeness of knowledge of the theoretical topics: mastery of the themes / problems dealt with in the lessons and readings; appropriate use of the terminology of the discipline; outcomes of the attention and quality of the presentation tests. • Quality of the documents of the applied reading and design exercises: appropriate knowledge of the places, quality of the project proposal, consistency of method, correct use of terminology, consistency with the theoretical indications provided by the course, active and constant participation in the seminar. To take the exam, each student must: 1) Produce the calculations relating to the applied exercise, the minimum contents of which will be better specified in the seminar activities. In any case, at least the following documents are required: • a - Reading the rule of law - programmatic framework (various scales) • b - Reading of the state of affairs - morphological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • c - Reading of the state of affairs - ecological characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • d - Reading of the state of affairs - functional characteristics (of each system) (various scales) • e - Reading of the state of affairs - diachronic formation of the state of fact (Scale 1: 10000) • f - Project proposal - volumetric plan (Scale 1: 2000) • g - Project proposal - morphological prescriptive (Scale 1: 2000) • h - Project proposal - zoning (Scale 1: 2000) The works a, b, c, d, e may be elaborated in a concerted way by informal groups of students even if the contents will remain the sole responsibility of the individual student. The works f, g, h are strictly personal. 2) During the examination, the documents referred to in point 1 will be presented in a strictly personal form in "pecha kucha" format (max 7 minutes - about 20 slides) with the help of a power point. During the presentation, the student must highlight the relationship between the choices made in the reading and project process and the topics covered in the communications with particular reference to the topics covered by the questions of the attention tests. References to themes and reflections taken from the literature reported must also be highlighted. 3) In principle no further direct questions will be asked. Nevertheless, during the interview in order to better ascertain the preparation, some questions may still be asked (also on the contents of the preparatory planning courses). During the examination it is necessary to submit all the documents in digital format (for example * .jpg - resolution for printing) including the presentation (* .ppt).

The course aims to provide an adequate knowledge of the policies, strategies and tools for housing, within the national and international regulatory framework, with particular reference to urban regeneration strategies. Regeneration strategies concern not only physical-morphological redevelopment interventions, but also projects aimed at providing an integrated response to the demands of environmental regeneration, socio-economic revitalization and cultural enhancement, according to principles of sustainability and resilience to environmental and socio-economic changes. Those strategies constitute the main point of reference for intervention in the contemporary city and, in particular, in the public housing settlements, pursuing the enhancement of the common goods, on which the structure and image of the city will be re-founded, the quality of the urban environment and the collective use of spaces. In this framework, the course will refer to best practices characterized by disciplinary innovation, contextualised in the specific geographical contexts and time, emblematic in terms of ecological-environmental sustainability, economic-financial feasibility and social inclusion. This best practices pursuit high levels of urban quality, through the construction of the public city and the enhancement of the common goods. Furthermore, through a sperimentation activity, the course aims to verify the theoretical, methodological and operational references acquired.

The student, at the beginning of the Course, must have acquired the main urban planning theoretical concept, as well as main legislative references concerning the tools of Territorial Governance.

I. Poli, Rigenerare la città esistente. Per una integrazione tra urbs e civitas, Aracne, Roma, 2021. G. Campos Venuti, Città senza cultura. Intervista sull’urbanistica, a cura di F. Oliva, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2010. C. Gasparrini, Savino, a cura di, La città resiliente, Sentieri Urbani n. 20/2016. C. Mattogno, Ventuno parole per l’urbanistica, Aracne edizioni, Roma, 2014. F. Oliva, L. Ricci, 2017, “Promuovere la rigenerazione urbana e la riqualificazione del patrimonio edilizio esistente”, in Antonini E., Tucci F., a cura di, Architettura, Città, Territorio verso la Green Economy, Edizioni Ambiente, 2017. I. Poli, C. Ravagnan, “Rigenerare le periferie pubbliche. Da spazi di margine a nodi di reti”, in M. Talia, a cura di, Il bisogno di giustizia nella città che cambia, Planum, Roma-Milano, 2018. I. Poli, C. Ravagnan, “La rigenerazione urbana nel Piano Regolatore Generale di Roma. Tra attuazione e innovazione”, in Ciudades n. 20/2017, Dossier monografico, Regenerar la ciudad. Condiciones y límites de una estrategia urbana integrada. I. Poli, C. Ravagnan, “Il piano urbanistico tra sostenibilità e resilienza. Nuovi concetti operativi e nuovi valori collettivi”, in Urbanistica n. 157/2016. L. Ricci, a cura di, Piano locale e… Nuove regole, nuovi strumenti, nuovi meccanismi attuativi, FrancoAngeli, Roma, 2009. L. Ricci, a cura di, Il nuovo piano di Roma, in Urbanistica n. 116/2001.

The experimentation activity Theme of the experimentation activity is the urban regeneration of an area of the Roman municipal territory characterized by the presence of public residential settlements with high levels of social, morphological, functional and environmental conditions of marginality. The experimentation activity is based on a methodological reference structure which, in coherence with the theoretical lessons and the operational communications, set up a two-tier process, and subsequent analysis and planning phases: 1 Level - The Local Plan - Local Plan: The structural components of the territory and the urban planning framework 2 Level - The Integrated Program - Analysis - Assessment and goals - Integrated Program Each phase requires the elaboration of specific documents and thematic maps according to a systemic approach (environmental system, morphological settlement system and system of services and infrastructures, planning system). Lessons and communications Theoretical lessons are aimed at defining the framework of policies, strategies and tools of Territorial Government, with particular reference to the theme of housing, also through the deepening of some emblematic urban planning cases, in Italy and in Europe, in particular the Masterplan of Rome (2008), taken as a reference also for the experimentation activity. The theoretical lessons deepen the following themes, within the most innovative disciplinary debate: - The different disciplinary perspectives (structural, morphological, ecological-environmental) for the analysis and planning of the contemporary city; - The contemporary city. The principles, strategies, tools and innovative implementation mechanisms of urban planning to pursue the urban regeneration strategy; - The public city. The construction of an urban framework in a structural, morphological and ecological-environmental perspective; - Policies, strategies and tools for housing. Cases and experiences. An operational communication anticipate the construction of the maps within the experimentation activities.

Attendance is not mandatory but recommended.

The exam is individual for the theoretical part and the experimentation activity is carried out and presented in groups of 3 students. The oral examination will focus on the topics of the lessons and on the illustration of the project proposal in order to verify the level of learning of the references, as well as the awareness of the assessment carried out and the project proposals.

D. Cecchini, a cura di, “Roma: Programmi integrati per la rigenerazione diffusa”, in Urbanistica Informazioni nn. 253-254, 2014. R. D’Onofrio, M. Talia, a cura di, La rigenerazione urbana alla prova, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2015. P. Di Biagi, “La periferia pubblica: da problema a risorsa per la città contemporanea”, in A. Belli, a cura di, Oltre la città: Pensare la periferia, Cronopio, Napoli 2006. M. Fior, I. Poli, G. Bevilacqua, “Historical network of Cultural Heritage for the regeneration of the contemporary city”, in C. Gambardella, a cura di, World heritage and legacy. Culture, creativity, contamination, Gangemi Editore, Roma, 2019. P. Galuzzi, P. Vitillo, Praticare il piano?, INU edizioni, Roma, 2011. P. Galuzzi, P. Vitillo, a cura di, Rigenerare la città. La perequazione urbanistica come progetto, Maggioli, Rimini, 2009. C. Giaimo, a cura di, Dopo 50 anni di standard urbanistici in Italia. Percorsi di riforma, Inu edizioni, Roma, 2019. F. Indovina, L. Fregolent, M. Savino, L’esplosione della città, Editrice Compositori, Bologna, 2005. M. Marcelloni, a cura di, Questioni della città contemporanea, Alinea, Firenze, 2006. C. Mattogno, R. Romano, a cura di, Dalla casa al paesaggio. Edilizia residenziale pubblica e mutamenti dell’abitare a Roma, Gangemi, Roma, 2019. D. Modigliani, a cura di, “L’edilizia sovvenzionata a Roma. Analisi e scenari per una gestione sostenibile”, in Urbanistica Informazioni nn. 249-250, 2013. F. Oliva, P. Galuzzi, P. Vitillo, Progettazione urbanistica. Materiali e riferimenti per la costruzione del piano comunale, Edilizia & Urbanistica, Maggioli editore, Dogana (RSM), 2002. F. Oliva, Il Nuovo piano, Urbanistica n. 135/2008. L. Pogliani, La casa sociale. Una questione di welfare. Problemi e soluzioni, Urbanistica n.149/2012. I. Poli, P. Carobbi, C. Ravagnan, “I Programmi integrati nell’esperienza romana”, in G. Buttarelli, A. Cappuccitti, a cura di, Progetto urbanistico e qualità della città. Scenari, strumenti, processi, INU Edizioni, 2018. I. Poli, P. Carobbi, L. Fonti, D. Modigliani, C. Ravagnan (2015), “Periferia pubblica e Centralità locali. I luoghi della rigenerazione a Roma”, in S. Saccomanni, a cura di, Periferie: cosa è rimasto di una stagione di rigenerazione urbana?, in Urbanistica Informazioni nn. 259-260/2015. C. Ravagnan, Rigenerare le città e i territori contemporanei. Prospettive e nuovi riferimenti operativi per la sperimentazione, Alinea, Roma, 2019. C. Ravagnan, I. Poli, “Trame verdi e blu: verso un futuro affidabile tra visione strategica e gestione dei rischi”, in Urbanistica n. 160/2017. L. Ricci, “Governare la città contemporanea. Riforme e strumenti per la rigenerazione urbana”, in Urbanistica n.160/2017.

The experimentation activity Theme of the experimentation activity is the urban regeneration of an area of the Roman municipal territory characterized by the presence of public residential settlements with high levels of social, morphological, functional and environmental conditions of marginality. The experimentation activity is based on a methodological reference structure which, in coherence with the theoretical lessons and the operational communications, set up a two-tier process, and subsequent analysis and planning phases: 1 Level - The Local Plan - Local Plan: The structural components of the territory and the urban planning framework 2 Level - The Integrated Program - Analysis - Assessment and goals - Integrated Program Each phase requires the elaboration of specific documents and thematic maps according to a systemic approach (environmental system, morphological settlement system and system of services and infrastructures, planning system). Lessons and communications Theoretical lessons are aimed at defining the framework of policies, strategies and tools of Territorial Government, also through the deepening of some emblematic urban planning cases, in Italy and in Europe, in particular the Masterplan of Rome (2008), taken as a reference also for the experimentation activity. The theoretical lessons deepen the following themes, within the most innovative disciplinary debate: - The different disciplinary perspectives (structural, morphological, ecological-environmental) for the analysis and planning of the contemporary city; - The contemporary city. The principles, strategies, tools and innovative implementation mechanisms of urban planning to pursue the urban regeneration strategy; - The public city. The construction of an urban framework in a structural, morphological and ecological-environmental perspective; - Policies, strategies and tools for housing. Cases and experiences. An operational communication anticipate the construction of the maps within the experimentation activities.